This informal CPD article, ‘The advantages of using direct debit to collect an organisations income' was provided by Movimo, who help organisations improve their Direct Debit and Bacs Direct Credit processes to ensure successful, stress-free payments.
Numerous organisations, large and small, use Direct Debit as a payment method. Typical organisations using Direct Debit include insurance providers, membership bodies, utility providers, financial institutions and more. Given the clear advantages offered by Direct Debit, it is not surprising why so many organisations choose Direct Debit over other payment methods such as standing order, credit card, cash and cheques.
What is Direct Debit?
A direct debit is a type of bank-to-bank payment that is governed by Bacs (now part of Pay.UK). It is the only payment method where money is ‘pulled’ rather than ‘pushed’. This means that the organisation looking to receive the funds (known as the Service User) initiates the transaction. The Service user takes authority from the payer to allow a Direct Debit to be collected; they provide advance notice of the amount and date of the Direct Debit; they initiate the request for payment and money is received on a known date into their bank account.
10 Advantages of using Direct Debit as a Payment Method
1. The Organisation is in control. The Service User for example, decides the amount and the date for the collection. It is the Service User that initiates the transaction. In this way, the collecting business has complete control. In contrast for example with standing orders, the paying customer will decide the amount and date. Also, with methods such as cheques, faster payments or credit cards, the organisation is reliant on the payer deciding to initiate the payment.
2. Flexibility. Because Direct Debits are set-up as an authority for the Service User to collect funds as required, the amount and the collecting date can change as required. Collections can be made on a regular interval – such as once a week or once a month. They could also be variable and collected on different days or dates depending on usage. This isn’t the case with standing orders for example that are for a set amount on a set date.
3. Feedback on failures. Service Users receive regular reports from Bacs advising of changes to the Direct Debit set-up and reasons why some collections may have failed. This is not the case with other payment methods. There are no reports for example to advise that a customer has not sent a cheque, has cancelled a standing order or won’t be making a credit card payment.
4. Reducing administration and mitigating the risk of human error. Direct Debits are ideal for bulk collections. Organisations upload a file containing multiple transactions. They process all these in one, automated approach. This allows validation at a total file level and saves time that would have been spent, for example, on processing individual card payments. This approach can also mitigate the risk of human error that can arise with multiple individual transactions and allows for split authorisation at a file level.
5. Saves time: Reconciliation of the bank account is much quicker due to the bulk submission approach. In addition, the provision of the Bacs reports means that transactions are only processed if there is a chance of them being successful. In turn, this means less need to chase customers for explanations around non-payment which can translate into significant time and resource savings for staff.
6. Cost-effective. Direct Debits can often be cheaper than other payment methods. Charges will vary but a bank may charge a small fee per submission file – or - it may charge a transactional fee which could be as low as a few pence. This can compare to a higher charge for other payment methods. With credit cards for example, the charge may be a % of the collected fee. If a large value is being collected, the fee paid can also be high. In addition, the reduced administrative workload and increased efficiency with Direct Debit contribute to lower operational costs.